We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
Feb 02, 2016 · What is GroupThink & GroupShift? We can find a big difference between group decision-making, discussion, group shift and groupthink. Group discussions and decision making should be encouraged in order to maintain a perfect group and avoiding groupshift and groupthink. We will discuss about them in this section to get a better idea. Groupthink
Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group. In many cases, people will set aside their own personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group. The term was first used in 1972 by social psychologist Irving L. Janis.
Janis introduced the concept of groupthink through the popular press in 1971.13 The idea struck a responsive chord with policy planners who had hastily ap proved courses of action that just as quickly turned out to be major blunders. The term . groupthink . paralleled the ominous expression . doublethink . in George Orwell's novel . 1984,
Characteristics of Groupthink Denial of vulnerability – group members may not be willing to acknowledge their own fallibility or vulnerability. Rationalization of decisions to minimize objections. Belief in the absolute goodness of the group.Aug 7, 2015
Examples of groupthink can be found in historic events such as the U.S. Invasion of Iraq, Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba, the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster and the Enron-Arthur Anderson scandal. (Thompson, 2008) In each of these examples, leadership style played a key role in enhancing groupthink conditions.
The eight symptoms of groupthink include an illusion of invulnerability or of the inability to be wrong, the collective rationalization of the group's decisions, an unquestioned belief in the morality of the group and its choices, stereotyping of the relevant opponents or out-group members, and the presence of “ ...
Symptoms of GroupthinkInvulnerability. Members of the group share an illusion of invulnerability that creates excessive optimism and encourages taking abnormal risks.Rationale. ... Morality. ... Stereotypes. ... Pressure. ... Self-censorship. ... Illusion of Unanimity. ... Mind Guards.
The characteristics of groupthink - Organisational Behaviour Illusion of invulnerability. Collective rationalization. Unquestioned belief. Stereotypical views.
This is an example of groupthink: People accepted a not-so-good idea as plausible to maintain harmony and coherence within their group. They opted for conformity rather than critical discourse. When challenged, they agreed they had gone too far and took back the accusation.May 11, 2017
Groupthink can cause people to ignore important information and can ultimately lead to poor decisions. This can be damaging even in minor situations but can have much more dire consequences in certain settings.Nov 12, 2020
Groupthink seems to occur most often when a respected or persuasive leader is present, inspiring members to agree with his or her opinion. It also is a powerful force when it validates the preconceived opinions of the individual members. It can be spot on and right.Mar 1, 2012
He suggested eight ways to avoid groupthink. Leaders should absent themselves from many of the group meetings to avoid influencing the outcome. Deliberately assign the role of "critical evaluator" to allow members to voice dissent. Nominate a group member to play the Devil's advocate.Oct 9, 2016
There are several main causes of groupthink. These include group cohesiveness, overall group isolation, group leadership, and decision-making stress. High levels of cohesiveness decrease the amount of verbal dissension within a tight group, due to interpersonal pressure to conform.
Initially, the leader of the group should avoid stating their opinions or preferences when assigning tasks. Give people time to come up with their own ideas first.
Impact of Groupthink. Groupthink can cause people to ignore important information and can ultimately lead to poor decisions. This can be damaging even in minor situations but can have much more dire consequences in certain settings.
Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group. In many cases, people will set aside their own personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group. The term was first used in 1972 by social psychologist Irving L. Janis.
Janis identified a number of different "symptoms" that indicate groupthink. 1 . Illusions of unanimity lead members to believe that everyone is in agreement and feels the same way.
Groupthink involves the decision-making process. On the other hand, conformity is a process in which people change their own actions so they can fit in with a specific group. Conformity can sometimes cause groupthink, but it isn't always the motivating factor.
Stereotyping leads members of the in-group to ignore or even demonize out-group members who may oppose or challenge the group's ideas. This causes members of the group to ignore important ideas or information. Self-censorship causes people who might have doubts to hide their fears or misgivings.
Kendra Cherry, MS, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Emily is a fact checker, editor, and writer who has expertise in psychology content.
Sociocognitive theory. According to a new theory many of the basic characteristics of groupthink – e.g., strong cohesion, indulgent atmosphere, and exclusive ethos – are the result of a special kind of mnemonic encoding (Tsoukalas, 2007).
A psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people. Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome . Cohesiveness, or the desire for cohesiveness, ...
The devil's advocate in a group may provide questions and insight which contradict the majority group in order to avoid groupthink decisions. A study by Hartwig insists that the devil's advocacy technique is very useful for group problem-solving.
Groupthink can have a strong hold on political decisions and military operations, which may result in enormous wastage of human and material resources. Highly qualified and experienced politicians and military commanders sometimes make very poor decisions when in a suboptimal group setting. Scholars such as Janis and Raven attribute political and military fiascoes, such as the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Vietnam War, and the Watergate scandal, to the effect of groupthink. More recently, Dina Badie argued that groupthink was largely responsible for the shift in the U.S. administration's view on Saddam Hussein that eventually led to the 2003 invasion of Iraq by the United States. After the September 11 attacks, "stress, promotional leadership, and intergroup conflict " were all factors that gave rise to the occurrence of groupthink. Political case studies of groupthink serve to illustrate the impact that the occurrence of groupthink can have in today's political scene.
The term was coined in 1952 by William H. Whyte Jr. Most of the initial research on groupthink was conducted by Irving Janis, a research psychologist from Yale University. Janis published an influential book in 1972, which was revised in 1982.
Testing groupthink in a laboratory is difficult because synthetic settings remove groups from real social situations, which ultimately changes the variables conducive or inhibitive to groupthink. Because of its subjective nature, researchers have struggled to measure groupthink as a complete phenomenon, instead frequently opting to measure its particular factors. These factors range from causal to effectual and focus on group and situational aspects.
Antecedent factors such as group cohesiveness, faulty group structure, and situational context (e.g., community panic) play into the likelihood of whether or not groupthink will impact the decision-making process.